|
|
|
School
Transfer:
What
are the unique problems that school transfer presents for children and what can
we do to help?
Shannon
Wolf
Kent
State University
Principles
of Social Learning
May
9, 2001
![]() |
School transfer has been described in the literature as a major life event that can result in stress and dysfunction for the child if support services are not in place to ease the transition. School transfer is unique for every child, and the result of the transition, positive or negative, depends on a number of variables that interact with and influence one another (Jason et al., 1992).
While school systems are becoming more aware of the difficulties that transfer students face, there is still a significant lack of understanding of the issues and the strategies and programs that can be used to help ease the transition process. Many schools, including inner city schools where classroom turnover rates may be as high as 50%, do not currently have a program to help ease the transition of the transfer student. What’s more is that even where programs are in place to orient the child to the school, they are usually not in place to monitor the student’s progress and to provide continued support (Alexander, Entwisle, & Dauber, 1996).
School psychologists, as advocates for children, have a responsibility to help develop an awareness of the issues these children face, and to devise programs and strategies for helping to ease the school transition process.
Ø
Scheduled:
Occurs when entire groups of students enter school or graduate from elementary or
junior high school.
Ø
Unscheduled:
Involve students in isolation changing schools.
Student transfer to a new school after summer break or during the middle
of the year (Jason et al., 1992).
While
scheduled transfers do present unique problems for children, the focus here will
be on the unscheduled transfer, which presents a host of problems that are
unique to a type of transfer in which the child is going it alone.
Issues
Children Face When Transferring to a New School:
Ø
Gaining
peer acceptance
Ø
Achieving
Academically
Ø
Complying
with behavioral expectations and standards of the new school
Ø
Gaining
acceptance from their teacher(s)
Ø
Adjusting
to a new school climate
(Filippeli & Jason, 1992)
Transfer
children deal with these issues at the same time as:
Ø
They are
trying to adjust to a new home and community
Ø
Their
parents are busy adjusting and may be temporarily preoccupied
Ø
They are
dealing with feelings of isolation and grief resulting from the abandonment of
their old way of life.
Ø
They may
be dealing with other transitions such as puberty in adolescence or the
transition from home to school in childhood.
Ø
They are
dealing with other factors unique to their situation that are impacting the
difficulties experienced in the transfer.
The relationship between mobility and student outcome is not a linear one, where the effects of mobility on children can be easily identified. Instead, this relationship is a reciprocal person-environment transactional relationship where there are several factors involved in the resulting impact of the transition (Jason, et al., 1992). Transition is unique for each child, and there are several variables that can positively and negatively impact the transition process. The following presents both the environmental variables and the personal variables that have been identified in the literature as having an impact on the outcome of the transition process:
Ø
The new
school differs greatly from old school in regards to
behavioral expectations, climate, curriculum, place in curriculum.
Ø
Parents
have low levels of education, and family is of low socioeconomic status.
Ø
The
support network within the family is absent.
Ø
The
family environment is chaotic, disorganized and unstable.
The family has moved several times, the moves were forced rather than
moves of choice, and they generally resulted in downward mobility rather than
upward mobility.
Ø
The child
may be a victim of abuse.
Ø
The
teacher develops a negative perception of the child
Ø
The child
is experiencing stressors in their life in addition to the school transfer,
which could include:
·
Major
life events: Examples may include serious illness in family, divorce of parents,
other transfers etc.
·
Enduring
life strains: Examples may include poor housing, few material resources etc.
·
Developmental
transitions: Examples may include transitioning from home to school in
childhood, or entering puberty in adolescence etc.
Risk
Factors: Personal
Ø
Low IQ
and low achievement (In several studies it was found that the transfer of schools
in itself does not have a substantial negative effect on achievement.
Rather those students who were achieving low previous to the transfer are
those whose achievement sufferers subsequent to the transfer)
Ø
Problem
Behaviors
Ø
Poor
coping skills and problem solving skills
Ø
External
locus of control and low levels of motivation
The child with the risk factors profiled above has been found to be the one most likely to experience several moves throughout his/her lifetime. These children need services to address the many factors that are negatively impacting their lives in order to buffer the possible negative effects of the transfers. In research, it has been found that when other factors were accounted for, mobility alone did not substantially account for the negative effects of student transfer. The risk factors, both personal and environmental, that these children carry with them confound the stress of the transfer and result in negative outcomes for mobile students.
What
Can We Do as School Psychologists to Minimize These Risk Factors?
Environmental:
Ø
The new
school differs greatly from old school in regards to behavioral expectations,
climate, curriculum, and place in curriculum.
Ø
Parental
and family factors
Contact the parents of the child. Meet with them and try to get a sense of the unique factors that the child has had to face and is still facing. Try to gain some understanding of the reasons for the move and of any family issues that you may be able to provide assistance or resources for.
Ø Child experiences stressors in addition to the transition.
Ø
Poor
teacher perception of child
Personal:
Ø
Low IQ
and low achievement
Ø
Problem
Behaviors
Ø
Poor
coping and problem solving skills
Ø
External
locus of control and low levels of motivation
Many
of these activities that we can engage in translate into roles that the school
psychologist can and should play in these children’s lives.
The
following are some of those roles:
Ø
Gather
and Provide Information
Ø
Ensure
proper placement
Ø
Develop
systematic, researched-based programs to help ease the transition of new
students.
Ø
Provide
guidance and counseling services if needed.
Ø
Develop a
monitoring system to track the progress of new students.
Many
of the risk factors experienced by transfer children can be addressed in
transfer programs. The school
psychologist, as child advocate, has a responsibility to help create these
programs and to help facilitate them when they are in place, so that the
possible negative effects of student transfer can be minimized.
Since much of the research has not demonstrated that significant academic
gaps result from relocation, and instead have demonstrated poor social
adjustment of mobile students, transfer programs must incorporate social support
for these students, as well as academic support.
The
following is an example of a research-based program that resulted in success
when used with seventh and eighth grade transfer students.
Ø Same sex children were selected as mentors and were each paired up with one transfer student.
Ø
Mentor
children met with a therapist during the first week of school.
The therapist explained the purposes and processes of the
Orientation-Treatment program. The therapist and mentor students discussed which aspects of
the school and community should be presented to the new students.
These topics included the physical layout of the school, general school
policies and rules, courses available, school and community activities, clubs
and athletic teams, and community facilities.
Ø
Orientation
Treatment groups composed of the new and old students met each day for one 45
minute to hour-long session each week for six weeks.
Ø
The
sessions were informal, information-giving, and problem-solving groups, with a
focus on assisting the new students to adjust to the school and community.
The groups tried to help new students form peer relationships, and to
discuss and hopefully resolve any adjustment problems or interpersonal conflicts
that emerged. Emphasis was placed on the expression of feelings and the
development of adaptive coping mechanisms.
Session I—Introduction: Rules were outlined for the group, and the group was broken down into dyads.
Each dyad, consisting of one new and one old student, interview each
other for five minutes and introduced one another to the group.
Session II and III—Orientation: Presentations were given by the mentor students, which
focused on orientation to the school and the community.
New students were encouraged to ask questions.
Sessions IV through VI—Treatment: New students were asked to come up with a list of good and
bad aspects of moving to a new school. These
lists were used to facilitate discussion about the transfer students’ feelings
about being newcomers to the school and the community.
* This program provides an example of a
successful attempt at easing the transition of transfer students. It is by no means the only path to follow when developing
assistance for transfer students. There
are many ways in which transfer programs can be set up to accommodate the unique
environment of each school.
Jason,
L.A., Weine, A.M., Johnson, J.H., Sohlberg, L.W., Filippelli, L.A., Turner, E.Y.,
& Lardon, C. (1992). Helping
transfer students: Strategies for educational and social readjustment. San
Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
This book provides a detailed discussion of the
problems that transfer students face when trying to adjust to a new school.
This discussion is centered around an ecological and transactional model
that looks at the multiple individual and environmental variables that can have
an impact on the outcome of student transfer.
Effective intervention strategies are presented through a discussion of a
particular school transition project.
Lash,
A. A., & Kirkpatric, S. L. (1994). Interrupted lessons: Teacher views of
transfer student education. American
Educational Research Journal, 31, 814-843.
This research study presents valuable information
about teacher perceptions that can be used when designing intervention programs
for transfer students. Teachers’
perceptions were examined from agricultural, military, urban, and stable
schools. It was found that although
teachers are aware of the unique issues that transfer students face, they do not
use this knowledge to design intervention for these students.
When designing programs for transfer students, it would be important to
keep this information in mind, so that the development of strategies for
teachers to use with these students in the classroom, rather than the
development of awareness of the issues these children face, could be the focus
when attempting to get teachers involved in easing the transition process.
Wright,
D. (1999). Student mobility:
A negligible and confounded influence on student achievement.
The Journal of Educational Research, 92, 347-353.
This research article discussed the impact of student
mobility on achievement. While
mobile students were found to generally have lower achievement, mobility was
found to be subordinate in magnitude to other factors such as ethnicity and
family income when predicting low achievement.
This study points out the complicated interaction of variables that can
either increase or decrease the transfer student’s chances for academic
success in their new school. It is
important when attempting to ease the transition of a student to be aware of all
of the variables that may or may not lead to a successful adjustment to their
new school. These variables can
then be addressed through incorporating them into a transition program aimed as
successful transition for mobile students.
Alaxander,
K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Dauber, S. L. (1996). Children in motion: School
transfers and elementary school performance.
The Journal of Educational Research, 90, 3-11.
Berg-Cross,
L., & Flanagan, R. (1988). Effects
of an orientation program on mobile transfer students.
Journal of Early Adolescence, 8, 311-324.
Filippelli,
L. A., & Jason, L. A. (1992). How
life events affect the academic adjustment and self-concept of transfer
children. Journal of
Instructional Psychology, 19, 61-65.
Nelson,
P. S., Simoni, J. M., & Adelman, H. S. (1996). Mobility and school functioning in the early grades.
The Journal of Educational Research, 89, 365-369.
Weine,
A. M., Kurasaki, K. S., Jason, L. A., Danner, K. E., & Johnson, J. H.
(1993). An evaluation of preventive
tutoring programs for transfer students. Child
Study Journal, 23, 135-139.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|